Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into the workplace, the Workers’ Compensation insurance system and the injury prevention process have greatly increased privacy concerns.
While the United States Constitution does not explicitly enumerate privacy rights, the Supreme Court has inferred privacy as a fundamental right from interpretations of constitutional amendments.
The advent of AI-powered technologies, such as facial recognition software and profiling, has raised questions concerning privacy infringement and algorithmic biases. Inaccuracies inherent in facial recognition algorithms (the facial recognition software at my home still can not differentiate between my twin daughters) should be reduced as the technology evolves, pos risks of false identifications and encroachments upon individuals’ privacy rights. Using AI-driven video surveillance systems may raise complex legal and regulatory challenges. Additionally, compliance with varying state laws and regulations governing personal data collection, storage, and use adds to the compliance challenges.
Ethical dilemmas abound in deploying AI-enabled surveillance technologies, particularly in unionized workplaces, where concerns over privacy infringements and workforce surveillance intersect. Labor unions advocate for transparency and fair treatment of their members. They are concerned that AI may result in unfair privacy invasions impacting the membership. They are also focused on potential changes in the workforce’s production requirements. The opacity of AI algorithms used for video analysis can raise ethical concerns about potential biases and discriminatory outcomes, necessitating transparency and accountability mechanisms.
A notable surveillance aspect is Subrosa (undercover) videoing of workers, particularly in investigating fraud within the workers’ compensation system. While such surveillance measures aim to uncover evidence of fraudulent activities, they also raise significant privacy concerns. Balancing the imperative to combat fraud by protecting workers’ privacy rights presents a nuanced ethical and legal challenge that requires careful consideration. Most States have laws, rules, and regulations concerning the gathering of Subrosa videos and their use in the court systems.
Robust data protection measures are imperative to safeguard sensitive information extracted from videos against unauthorized access or misuse. Ensuring the security and integrity of individuals’ facial features and other identifiable traits is essential to mitigate privacy risks associated with AI-driven video surveillance.
Achieving a delicate balance between the benefits of AI-enabled video surveillance for security and safety purposes and respecting individuals’ privacy rights is paramount.
Balancing security imperatives with privacy requirements reinforces the need for thoughtful consideration of this issue’s ethical, legal, and technological dimensions.
There is no easy and elegant answer to many of the questions being propounded on this issue. Those who use or are implementing AI programs must constantly review existing legal requirements and ethical considerations.
Most privacy laws were drafted before AI technology was designed. Maintaining appropriate privacy levels and complying with various privacy laws while using AI is an evolving challenge. The confluence of privacy issues and AI presents management challenges that require flexibility and constant diligence. Striving for transparency, accountability, and ethical governance in deploying AI technologies is essential to navigating the evolving landscape of privacy rights in the digital age.
Skip to content