Work Comp (should) Welcome P&C Claims Adjusters

I’ve had several conversations over the past few months with independent claims adjusters looking for a different role. It started when a friend, Roberta Mike, invited me to her Workers’ Compensation Career Mentorship Group on Facebook that has over 1000 members. Many of them are P&C (property, auto, etc.) staff or independent claims adjusters.

There are apparently two challenges in that line of work.

The first is that work can be sporadic, especially if they’re focused on serving policyholders impacted by floods or tornados. Chasing catastrophes is often not a consistent source of work and income.

The other challenge has a direct connection to workers’ compensation – making a difference. Helping someone repair a house or car that was damaged by an accident or weather can be fulfilling as that life disruption has many ripple effects. However, an even more compelling way to make a difference is helping an injured worker navigate a complex system during a very difficult time in their life. Reduced income, uncertain medical future, loss of comradery with their work friends, and other components of an occupational injury create anxiety and confusion. It also creates an opportunity for an individual to make a significantly positive difference in another individual’s life.

Roberta’s suggestion, which I’ve helped underscore a handful of times, is to leverage their P&C claims experience to transition to an even more noble purpose. They are used to making people whole. Rather than putting a roof back together, put a life back together.

However, a strange thing can happen during that transition. When applying for a claim’s professional role in workers’ compensation, they’re often told their experience is not applicable. The work comp system is apparently so different in the minds of hirers that it’s an apples to oranges comparison. I’ve overheard and observed opportunities denied or delayed due to a lack of “relevant experience.”

My question is … Why is a seasoned P&C claims adjuster a less desirable option than hiring someone from college who has zero experience in work comp? It seems to me that claims experience, albeit in a different payer situation, would be a huge head start for training on work comp.

I have been making the argument for several years that to overcome the empty seats, we need to be more creative where we find the next wave of talent. Following is a short list that I’ve been proposing:

  • Evaluate every job description to ensure the educational requirements are not overstated (does every job really require a college degree).
  • Soften the automated evaluation of CVs and LinkedIn profiles (many candidates never get evaluated by a person because they are ruled out by technology).
  • Create a broader search criterion (NAAIA, HIRMA, AAIN, community / junior colleges, vocational schools, high schools).
  • Recruit from other industries (nurses in hospitals, social workers, people in retail with strong customer service skills).
  • Don’t forget there is an older generation with expertise and experience who might be open to rejoining the workforce.
  • Focus on “durable skills” (professional capabilities like teamwork, problem-solving, critical thinking, flexibility, empathetic listening) then teach them the “hard skills.”

Now I would like to add one more option … non work comp claims adjusters.

We have supported their interest here at WorkCompCollege. One individual became a WC claims adjuster, following months of rejections, shortly after graduating with her WRPA. Several other students are in-progress, and we are continuing our outreach.

Bottom line … Don’t be an “Einstein” (same thing ≠ different results). Be an Einstein (“a body in motion moves at a constant speed in a straight line unless acted on by an outside force”). Be that “outside force” by thinking, and acting, differently.